|
|
Coming to Balance.
An exploration of "Woman weighing Pearls" by
Johannes Vermeer.
(page 1 of 2)
The delicacy of light and shadow, the sheen of living
flesh, the magical appreciation of femininity, the soft
harmonies of colour, the wonderful evocation of interior
space, the compositional perfection, the peacefulness,
poise and emotional power of Vermeer's art have always
won him many admirers. Most of his paintings also pose
riddles that arouse our problem-solving instincts.
Somehow Vermeer manages to capture a person transfixed
in a moment of domestic life, opening a window, reading
a letter or pouring milk, and by the attraction of his
art he transfixes the onlooker too. The rapt
concentration going on "inside" the picture is now
reproduced "outside" it as the viewer seeks to engage
with and understand the painting.
In most of his work Vermeer displays not merely an
astonishing visual talent as colourist and designer, but
engaging depths of thought. He had an extraordinary
capacity to carry the moral seriousness of history
painting into tranquil interior scenes. Through the
lowly doorway of domestic life we find ourselves being
inducted into regions lit by reflections from eternal
realms. By the intensity of his respect for his models
we encounter persons in all their exquisite otherness.
To begin to engage with his art we have to identify with
the humanity of his subjects. There is a stillness, so
we must stop, and fragments of a human story, so we
begin to wonder. A pictorial fragrance of love and
loveliness draws us in. As soon as the artist's
competence has won our trust, and the painting's beauty
has bathed our vision, we realise that there are matters
to be decided. Our participation is invited.
Vermeer painted this picture of the Woman Weighing
Pearls in 1661, at a time when Holland was at the
forefront of European development - the first capitalist
society with fleets that spanned the globe and a
merchant banking system and stock exchange to support
them, and the first nation of empowered middle class
prosperity and intellectual curiosity. No other European
society possessed such a concentration of scientists,
philosophers, free-thinkers, artists and exiles as the
great Dutch mercantile cities could then sustain. Out of
the wars of independence from Spanish rule, the Dutch
had emerged not merely the stronger, more advanced and
prosperous society, but also the more inclusive. The
Dutch triumph marked the effective death of the
Inquisition. The requirement to unite as many of its
citizens as possible in the war of independence,
particularly those from the Catholic area of Flanders to
the south, ensured that under the overall protestant
ethic of the majority, toleration became the modus
vivendi of the new republic in its Golden Age. And
Vermeer was a Protestant married to a Roman Catholic so
for him the art of balance was not only the political
ethic of his society and the rational goal of his age,
but the foundation of his domestic happiness.
With the close of the almost genocidal conflicts of the
Thirty Years War at the Peace of Westphalia in 1648, a
war-torn Continent had begun to accept that the
ideological conflicts of the Reformation and the Counter
Reformation could never be solved by military violence.
What Isaiah Berlin called, "The first great wave of
optimistic rationalism which followed the Wars of
Religion," and which later "broke against the violence
of the great French Revolution and the despotism and
misery which ensued," was already visible. Across
Europe, with greater or lesser creativity the hunger for
order and balance was everywhere to be seen. From Milton
and Marvel to Moliere and Racine poetry and literature
began to emphasise structure, harmony and sheer delight
in the rule of rationality. This was the great age of a
pioneering love of mathematics, especially geometry, in
all corners of educated society. Consequently the
subject began to develop at an astonishing pace.
Descartes' Cartesian system which gave birth to analytic
geometry opened the way to the development of calculus
by Newton and Leibniz and was followed before long by
Newton's Principia Mathematica which had a phenomenal
effect upon European thinking.
In Vermeer's time there was still no sense that the arts
and sciences were in any sense antithetical. In fact
Renaissance artists had long been pioneers of
mathematics, and had energetically combined the roles of
painter, architect, engineer and anatomist. Vermeer
inherited this explorative tradition and made thorough
scientific preparations for his paintings, experimenting
with the camera obscura, studying colour theory, and
showing strict regard for mathematical principles. But
at the same time, in common with most of his
contemporaries, he also held religious studies in high
regard, and his art conveys a finely-tuned sense of
spiritual awareness.
Indeed, Vermeer's painting arrives on the scene at a
time of strong renewal of personal faith and piety both
in Protestant and Catholic circles. Just when the hope
of establishing an exterior ideological structure for
European Christendom has had to be abandoned, fires of
individual encounter with God and personal faith in
Jesus flare up on all sides. Blaise Pascal's Provincial
Letters, and later his Pensées had a great impact among
intellectuals. He was a brilliant thinker, and a great
pioneer in physics and mathematics as well as an
inventor of machines such as the hydraulic pump. Not
only does his extraordinarily "modern " mind almost
prophetically address problems of sophisticated
scepticism ahead of time, but he combines the head of a
genius with the heart of a child. Having had a
conversion experience that amounted to a coach crash
with truth, he confessed that he had encountered a mind
that outclasses all minds, and a love that sustains all
love. After his death his valet found a piece of paper
sewed into his coat on which a message read, "Fire. God
of Abraham, God of Isaac, God of Jacob, not of the
philosophers and the scholars..."
Pascal's credentials as a scientist would have been well
known in Holland, and this may well have brought him to
the attention of artists as thoughtful as Vermeer. But
whether or not Vermeer was aware of his apologetic work,
this was the age of Bunyan, Fox and Penn, an age that
witnessed the courage of the Pilgrim Fathers in America,
and the humility of brother Lawrence practising the
presence of God in the kitchen and the sandal shop of
the Carmelite Priory in Paris, followed by the patience
of Madame Guyon in prison, and the perseverance of the
Huguenots. The combined effects of the Reformation and
the printing press had placed the Bible into the hands
of all who could read, and they could also, in turn,
comment on what they were reading. It was probably the
first age when personal faith received intellectual
stimulation and empowerment on a vast scale. One of the
challenges faced by thinkers in Vermeer's Holland, which
lay at the centre of intellectual as well as spiritual
ferment, was to bring into balance all that was being
disclosed.
Usually Vermeer avoided direct religious piety in his
art. He had all the delicacy and sensitivity of a free
man who has no intention of imposing himself on others,
and still less of policing them. Nevertheless he was a
man of his age, the Dutch were fond of moral and
religious allegories, and he had to reach his
contemporaries through a frame of reference they could
readily understand. The most obvious way to establish a
philosophical, moral or religious framework for a
painting is to paint a picture within a picture that
will allow for all sorts of analysis, comparison, and
reflection. Like a mirror seen within a mirror, a
picture within a picture suddenly gives a painting an
unexpected narrative dimension, an outside as well as an
inside, raising wonderful questions about the interplay
between objective and subjective worlds.
Something like this is happening in Vermeer's painting "Woman Weighing Pearls."
Behind the young woman is a
painting of the last judgment partially obscured by
shadow. Clearly, although Vermeer is not forcing a
religious viewpoint, he is setting the scene more firmly
than he does in many other paintings. His contemporaries
would immediately have understood how to "read" the
picture. At least, they would have thought they did.
Almost certainly they would have jumped to the
conclusion that this was a conventional "vanitas"
painting presenting a traditional Christian teaching in
a novel style. And this is the interpretation that has
generally been followed ever since. Given the power and
prosperity of 17th century protestant Dutch society, the
young woman would seem to serve as a poignant warning.
Behind and above her, whilst she is weighing pearls, in
the picture within the picture Christ is weighing souls.
At first glance she seems unaware that her life also is
in the balance. In the context of the final judgment the
value of earthly possessions is trivial, and fascination
with them a snare. So apparently there is more than a
hint of irony that the woman's unconscious behaviour is
affecting her destiny.
That is as far as some accounts of this picture are able
to go, even today. Consequently there are viewers who
rate it slightly lower than, say, "Woman In Blue Reading
A Letter," because they find the moralising out of
harmony with the picture's aesthetic and human appeal.
They feel that, possibly for the sake of a client,
Vermeer has forced a beautiful work of imagination into
a religious straightjacket.
However, there is much more to be said on the artist's
behalf. If this picture amounts to no more than a
slightly embarrassing illustration of a religious
allegory, a routine "genre" painting, it is hard to
account for the depth of meditation it arouses. There is
a peacefulness, a truthfulness and a loving-kindness
about it which holds the viewer captive. It is a calm,
satisfying and life-affirming picture that does not
quickly lead us to a simplistic moral terminus, or we
would just as quickly be bored by it. Besides, no artist
wants to let his viewers go so easily. Certainly not an
artist of Vermeer's ability.
So there are puzzles. Firstly, whereas many viewers
might have quickly prided themselves on perceiving the
simple "vanitas" message, (store up for yourselves
treasure in heaven for where your treasure is there your
heart will be also...) few perhaps would have gone on
to detect the more exquisite irony that just as the
woman is attracted by the beauty of her jewellery, the
viewer is attracted by the beauty of the woman, and also
by the beauty of the painting itself. Certainly Vermeer
knew that not only prospective buyers, but most
onlookers would "weigh up" his picture in the balance of
their minds - as the woman is weighing her pearls, and
with at least the same degree of fascination. Which is
the greater snare, the pearls or the picture? Such
considerations provide the start point for a moral
enquiry closer to home. It may be that the woman is not
the satisfying object of superior appraisal that she
seems on the surface to be, but the bait that brings us
to be weighed in the same balance! Like novelists and
prophets, artists do sometimes turn the tables on us.
But there is something more wonderful here than a game
to catch an unwary onlooker. We immediately see that the
woman is beautiful. Moreover she is pregnant which
enhances the sense of integrity and innocence that
permeates the painting. The woman herself is facing the
light, and the golden new moon of her full belly
reflects sunshine from the yellow-curtained window,
suggesting ripeness and fulfilment. It is difficult to
read such warm blessings in a negative sense. Her wealth
of jewellery is quite impressive from a middle-class
Dutch burgher's point of view but by no means wildly
excessive, her clothing stylish but not especially
sophisticated, and her surroundings comfortable but not
opulent. The woman is not in turmoil. Her demeanour
conveys authority as well as calm. Heavy with child she
seeks steadiness to still the scales she is holding in
her right hand simply by stretching out the finger-tips
of her left hand to touch the table. Nothing more. Her
body language speaks of a thoughtful and balanced
personality. All in all this portrait of a young wife is
so positive, so warm heartedly and lovingly composed
that Vermeer seems very far from laying a judgement upon
her.
In Vermeer's society women did have scope for the
running of their own households, (as, for example his
own wealthy mother-in-law, Maria Thins) and might be
much involved in family financial affairs at a time when
a banking system had barely been invented. Gold, silver
and jewellery were not solely for superfluous
ornamentation as they mostly are today, but fulfilled
the same function as both a current and a savings
account, and were used as a way of transferring funds to
others. Very likely, therefore, we are to understand
that the young woman is engrossed in competently judging
a practical matter - the value of her own or someone
else's property in order to ascertain how much she has
been given, or how much she must pay out. Furthermore,
the woman's scales are empty, which suggests that for
the moment she is balancing spiritual as well as
financial considerations. Hence far from being ignorant
or unaware of the painting behind her, the woman might
easily be acting in obedience to it. Her deliberation,
set against Christ's final task, can be seen as the
beauty of a child of God made in God's image who is
herself participating in the making of accurate
judgements in which moral, material and spiritual
considerations are balanced.
Whether or not Vermeer intended to catch out casual
viewers in the limitations of conventional moralising, a
deeper intention seems to be to illustrate that it is
possible to lead lives of balance, that it is possible
to exercise moderation, and that it is possible to deal
with material things with full understanding of the
implications of a final judgment by Christ in which the
criterion is not ownership but stewardship, not quantity
of possessions but degree of love. Therefore, far from
condemning the young woman, by this account Vermeer is
upholding her good judgement. And so we arrive at a
complete volte-face from an opinion dictated by
superficial or legalistic interpretations of scripture.
One of Vermeer's more subtle points seems to be that if
a little knowledge is a dangerous thing, a little
morality, or a little conventional religion, is even
more so.
If you rule two diagonal lines from the four corners
they meet at the exact centre of the painting, precisely
at the faintly visible fulcrum of the woman's balance.
Therefore, to say that this painting is about balance
and right judgement is almost a tautology. Somewhere on
the scale between caring nothing for possessions and
withdrawing completely from the world on the one hand,
and being possessed by possessions on the other, there
must be a point of balance at which the person is
engaged with the materials of life yet free. In this
young woman Vermeer has attempted to paint that point of
balance. And by focusing on the personality and
thoughtfulness of his subject he tells us that in
principle this balance is accessible to us all. But he
also tells us that such a point can only be reached with
divine help. He does this by placing the woman's head
directly beneath Christ's feet, and by giving her a
white head-cloth to signify her purity of mind and
submission to him, and by creating - with marvellous
skill - the dignity and poise of a woman who has
authority because she has placed herself under
authority.
read on |

|